La risposta della Russia alla crisi ucraina significa che Mosca ha tradito il “nuovo ordine mondiale”

Moscow’s refusal to acquiesce to NATO over Ukraine signals new cold war
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
April 25, 2014

Image: Vladimir Putin (Wiki Commons).

Top diplomat Christopher R. Hill says that Russia’s response to the Ukraine crisis means that Moscow has betrayed the “new world order” it has been a part of for the last 25 years.

In a piece for the influential Project Syndicate publication, Hill, a former US ambassador to Iraq and Korea, writes that Russia’s annexation of Crimea and “intimidation” campaign against Kiev has brought an end to a 25-year historical period, accusing Moscow of engaging in “regression, recidivism, and revanchism”.

Hill’s definition of the “new world order” is Russia’s post-Glasnost involvement in “Western institutions, a market economy, and a multi-party parliamentary democracy.”

“This new world order held for almost 25 years. Except for Russia’s brief war with Georgia in August 2008 (a conflict generally seen as instigated by reckless Georgian leadership), Russia’s acquiescence and commitment to the “new world order,” however problematic, was one of the great accomplishments of the post-Cold War era,” writes Hill.

Hill, who is an advisor with the Albright Stonebridge Group, a “global strategy company” with tentacles deep within the White House and the State Department, goes on to accuse Moscow of reviving the days of the Soviet empire, adding that, “Russia….no longer seems interested in what the West has been offering for the last 25 years: special status with NATO, a privileged relationship with the European Union, and partnership in international diplomatic endeavors.”

Arguing that western sanctions are unlikely to have any impact, Hill asserts that NATO should prepare itself for the long haul, warning that Russia “will seek to make similar trouble among former Soviet “allies,” invoking the German invasion of Poland in 1939 to suggest that Moscow may launch aggression against other eastern European nations.

Hill’s assertion that Russia has turned its back on the “new world order” illustrates how Moscow is seeking to lead an alternate BRICS-aligned faction that will pose a major threat to the unipolar future envisaged by the United States and NATO.

In other words, whether Russia wants one or not, the western elite is digging in for a new Cold War and the world may be entering the most dangerous period of history since the Cuban missile crisis.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

This article was posted: Friday, April 25, 2014 at 2:31 pm

Tags: foreign affairs

 La risposta della Russia alla crisi ucraina significa che Mosca ha tradito il “nuovo ordine mondiale”

02mag

Mosca ha tradito il “nuovo ordine mondiale”. A dire questa frase è il consulente per la Stonebridge Group Albright, una “società di strategia globale” con i tentacoli all’interno della Casa Bianca e nel Dipartimento di Stato, costui, continua ad accusare Mosca di far rivivere i giorni dell’impero sovietico, aggiungendo che “la Russia … . non sembra più interessata a ciò che l’Occidente gli ha  offerto negli ultimi 25 anni: status speciale con la NATO, un rapporto privilegiato con l’Unione Europea e la partnership in sforzi diplomatici internazionali”.  Continua alla fonte 

---